GENOCIDE COMPLICITY CASE Robbie Thorpe v Mark Dreyfus, Stephen Donaghue, Commonwealth of Australia.

FAIL TO PREVENT GENOCIDE.

COMPLICITY IN GENOCIDE.

On Monday 6 November 2023 there was a secret ceremony at the High Court for the new Chief Justice to swear the oath of allegiance to the Sovereign First Peoples of “Australia”… er, no, rewind…to swear the oath of allegiance to some foreign imposter and pretender and genocidist calling himself “King Charles III of Australia” … to an audience of a record number of judges past and present from across Australia including many by videolink.

While the mutual-backslapping invitation-only ceremony was going on up in the main courtroom, Robbie Thorpe was down in the (virtual) court registry trying to lodge (by email) a new case seeking declaratory orders that:

1. First Peoples have never ceded Their Sovereignty and have never consented to the jurisdiction over Them claimed by Commonwealth of Australia.

2. The sole basis for the jurisdiction claimed by Commonwealth of Australia over First Peoples is genocide against First Peoples.

3. The International Criminal Court now has jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute genocidists in Commonwealth of Australia.

4. The denial of First Peoples’ Sovereignty is clear proof of the objective fact that accused genocidists possessed the relevant criminal intent to destroy First Peoples.

If the Court refused to make those orders, Robbie’s fallback position was to seek orders that:

1. Attorney-General of Commonwealth of Australia, MARK DREYFUS, must investigate the genocide of First Peoples and assess the evidence for genocide prosecutions.

2. The Criminal Code sections stipulating that only the Attorney-General can prosecute genocidists are invalid and unconstitutional.

Registry refused to accept the case and Robbie made a detailed complaint to the Racial Discrimination Commissioner (with the many relevant documents attached) and then included that complaint in an administrative application to the Chief Justice to overrule the Registrars and order his case be filed and issued– except it seems the Registrars refused to let the Chief Justice hear the application.

Robbie has proposed to the judicial officers and the Law Reform Commission and the Attorney-General etc that there be a new Rule added whereby self-represented persons may make such an application to file and issue if registry blocks the case.

Robbie is making a formal complaint to the Chief Justice and a further complaint to the Racial Discrimination Commissioner.

CURRENT DOCUMENTS

1. Corruption Report of Robert Thorpe to National Anti-Corruption Commissioners BRERETON, ROSE, GAUNTLETT, HINCHCLIFFE and CEO REED, 9am, 6 November 2023.

2. ROBERT THORPE, plaintiff v MARK DREYFUS Attorney-General of Commonwealth of Australia, first defendant, STEPHEN DONAGHUE Solicitor-General of Commonwealth of Australia, second defendant, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, third defendant– High Court of Australia (HCA)– Application for a constitutional writ, with supporting affidavit of Robert Thorpe, 10am 6.11.23

2b. Email of Application and Affidavit to Registry HCA, 9.55am 6.11.23

3. Swearing-in Ceremony for new Chief Justice Gageler of High Court, 10.10am-11.03am, 6.11.23

4. Email from HCA Registry rejecting lodgement by email, 1pm, 6.11.23

5. Electronic Lodgement in HCA website on 6.11.23 of same documents as emailed to Registry at 9.55am same day–see 2. above–Robert Thorpe v Mark Dreyfus, Stephen Donaghue, Commonwealth of Australia —

NOTE: The scan quality on documents (i) and (ii) is terrible– the documents are identical to those above at 2. which have much better scan quality (one of the reasons why they were emailed to registry instead of digital lodgement on High Court website portal– long story, but anyhow same original documents).

(i) Application of Robert Thorpe for a constitutional or other writ, 6.11.23

(ii) Affidavit of Robert Thorpe, 6.11.23

(iii) Fee Waiver form and health card, Robbbie Thorpe

6. Rejection email from Deputy Registrar YOUNG, 12.40pm 7.11.23

7. RT email to Young asking if Young is refusing to issue an application seeking such orders and foreshadowing administrative hearing before Chief Justice, 1,15pm, 10.11.23

8. Complaint of Robert Thorpe to Racial Discrimination Commissioner CROUCHER with Two Attachments,12.11.23

8b. Index of ATTACHMENT ONE- High Court Registry key documents 6.10.23 to 10.11.23– and ATTACHMENT TWO–Yoorrook Royal Commission evidence of Robert Thorpe,12.11.23

8c. Attachments– files on google drive

Attachment One, pages 1-100, PDF 2 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Tf0MKW5jS90HpXe00uMTXaCvDqF_DsZK/view

Attachment One, pages 101-200, PDF 3 https://drive.google.com/file/d/18Rp2JYODrKeSm2L2ac9RzN5LcBYYKHiS/view

Attachment One, pages 201-285, PDF 4 https://drive.google.com/file/d/12VG_MJO-PPW04rOqjppD6sSewNeyvclZ/view

Attachment Two, pages 1-96, PDF 5 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sTgtzIJYrzw6io8FDNJSkf212gXGmYyV/view